An independent 15-signal audit of how ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude see lumar.io — measured live on May 24, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC.
lumar.io scored 75 / 100 on the Agentic Audit. Verdict: Good — minor optimizations available. The highest-priority fix is to add faqpage json-ld to product & info pages — estimated +8 score points in 1-2 days.
lumar.io your site?Claim this audit and get weekly score monitoring + alerts when ChatGPT, Perplexity or Gemini change how they cite you.We asked ChatGPT and Gemini three real questions about lumar.io. 5 of 6 answers mentioned the brand by name.
Q1.What is lumar? Briefly describe what they do.
Lumar is a technology company that offers an enterprise-scale website optimization platform, focused primarily on improving the technical health and search engine performance of websites. Founded in 2010 originally as DeepCrawl, Lumar helps businesses analyze and monitor their website architecture, enabling them to identify and resolve technical issues that could affect their online visibility. Their platform is used by digital marketing, SEO, and accessibility teams across large organizations like Adobe, Microsoft, and Deloitte. Lumar's services include optimizing website performance and ensu…
Lumar is an enterprise website optimization platform designed to enhance technical SEO, site speed, web accessibility, and overall website health for large organizations. Formerly known as Deepcrawl until its rebranding in September 2022, Lumar provides a comprehensive toolkit for managing complex digital operations. The platform's core activities include: * **Website Crawling and Auditing:** Lumar utilizes advanced crawling technology to analyze websites, identifying issues such as broken links, redirect chains, duplicate content, and structural problems that can hinder search performance.…
Q2.Is lumar reputable and worth using? What are the pros and cons?
### Lumar Overview Lumar, previously known as Deepcrawl, is a comprehensive SEO tool designed primarily for technical SEO audits and insights. It caters to businesses looking to optimize their websites for better search engine performance by offering features such as crawls, monitoring, and reporting. ### Reputation Lumar is generally regarded as a reputable tool within the SEO community. It has received positive reviews, highlighting its robust features, particularly for technical analysis and customer support. Users appreciate its intuitive design and speed compared to other tools. ### P…
Lumar, formerly known as Deepcrawl, is a reputable enterprise-level website intelligence platform widely regarded as a powerful tool for technical SEO, site health monitoring, and quality control. It is particularly well-suited for large, complex websites and enterprise-scale operations. ### Pros of Using Lumar: * **Scale and Reliability** Lumar excels at handling very large websites with millions of URLs, performing deep crawls and JavaScript rendering efficiently without the limitations of desktop tools. It can process up to 450 URLs per second for standard HTML and 350 URLs per second fo…
Q3.What are the best alternatives to lumar? List 3-5 competitors.
Here are some of the best alternatives to Luminar for photo editing, each offering unique features and capabilities: 1. **Adobe Photoshop**: - A comprehensive photo editing software known for its extensive features and professional-grade tools. Ideal for advanced graphic design and photo manipulation. - More info: [Adobe Photoshop](https://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop.html) 2. **Adobe Lightroom**: - A powerful photo management and editing tool that provides non-destructive editing and excellent organization features, perfect for photographers looking to process large batches of …
Lumar (formerly Deepcrawl) is an enterprise-grade website optimization platform specializing in technical SEO, site speed, web accessibility, and AI search visibility. It's designed for large websites and offers features like fast crawling, over 250 built-in reports, and customizable analytics. Here are 3-5 top alternatives to Lumar: * **Semrush** Semrush is a comprehensive digital marketing platform that offers a highly-rated site audit tool as part of its broader suite. It's praised for keyword research and overall helpfulness, and is considered a strong overall alternative to Lumar. * …
Run a head-to-head audit against any competitor. Side-by-side scorecard, signal-by-signal winner, ready to share on LinkedIn — and tag the competitor while you're at it.
The audit ran 15 signal checks against lumar.io on May 24, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Each signal is graded individually below with the actual value extracted from the live site — not generic recommendations. You can re-run this audit at any time to see updated values.
| Signal | Status | Observed value |
|---|---|---|
| GPTBot OpenAI / ChatGPT crawl |
Not declared | No rule found |
| PerplexityBot Perplexity AI crawl |
Not declared | No rule found |
| Google-Extended Gemini grounding |
Not declared | No restriction |
| ClaudeBot Anthropic Claude crawl |
Not declared | Not declared |
| llms.txt AI crawler manifest |
Blocked | GET /llms.txt → 404 |
| sitemap.xml URL discovery |
Allowed | Found at /sitemap.xml |
| Organization JSON-LD Entity clarity |
Allowed | Found · 5 sameAs links |
| FAQPage JSON-LD Highest-extractability signal |
Blocked | Missing on all pages |
| Product / HowTo schema Rich snippet eligibility |
Not declared | Neither found |
| WebSite schema Search action |
Allowed | Found |
| Person schema (E-E-A-T) Author authority |
Not declared | Missing |
| Open Graph meta Social + AI extraction |
Not declared | og:title ✓ · og:desc ✓ · og:image ✗ |
| Canonical URL Duplicate prevention |
Allowed | Declared |
| dateModified signal Freshness |
Allowed | Found |
| Markdown companion Clean prose for AI |
Not declared | Not detected |
Three structural factors drove lumar.io's score, in order of impact:
Of the four major AI engines, lumar.io allows or does not block any of the major AI bots — full crawl access is in place.
lumar.io publishes Organization JSON-LD, and no pages expose FAQPage schema — the most underused high-leverage signal for AEO. Without it, AI engines cannot extract Q&A directly into answer snippets even when the answer is on the page.
Content depth on the homepage measures 1,975 words across 19 headings, with 2 question-form headings detected. Content depth is strong — well above the threshold AI engines reward.
FAQPage schema is the highest-extractability signal for AEO. AI engines read it directly into answer snippets — without it you cannot be the source of an answer even when the answer is on your page.
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "FAQPage",
"mainEntity": [{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "What does your product do?",
"acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "..." }
}]
}
</script>
Anthropic's ClaudeBot honors explicit allow rules. Adding one signals consent and improves crawl frequency.
User-agent: ClaudeBot
Allow: /
Perplexity and emerging AI crawlers respect /llms.txt for crawl preferences. A missing manifest means the engine guesses your priorities. See llmstxt.org for the format.
# Your Brand
> One-line description
## Docs
- [Getting Started](https://yourdomain.com/docs)
- [API Reference](https://yourdomain.com/api)
Anthropic, Stripe, Mintlify and Vercel docs serve clean .md mirrors so AI bots get pure prose without DOM noise. Pages with .md companions are cited at higher rates.
Free live scan across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude · competitor share-of-voice · PDF export. Sent to your inbox in ~2 min.
The Agentic Audit is a per-domain field study, not a programmatic content page. Each report is generated only when a real user requests an audit of a specific domain — there is no pre-spawning of report URLs.
We extract 15 distinct signals directly from the live target site (robots.txt, sitemap.xml, llms.txt, JSON-LD blocks, OpenGraph tags) and grade each against documented thresholds. Methodology is versioned (currently v1.0) and weights are documented per category.
Scoring weights: Crawl Access 30% · Schema 25% · Citation Readiness 25% · Freshness 20%. Each category accumulates points from individual signals; the total is the Agentic Score (0-100).
✓ Compliant with Google's March 2024 spam policies
Each report contains unique, first-party measurements of a specific domain — not "scaled content abuse" as defined in Google's March 2024 update. Reports are people-first under the Helpful Content guidelines: the data is original, the recommendations are actionable and source-attributed. Reports come from two sources — visitor-requested audits, and a small hand-curated seed list of recognized SaaS companies whose AI visibility has genuine search demand. Both use the same live measurement pipeline; nothing is template-filled. This report meets our quality threshold and is indexable.
lumar.io scored 75 out of 100 on the Agentic Audit, measured May 24, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Verdict: Good — minor optimizations available. The full breakdown shows crawl access 23/30, schema 13/25, citation readiness 22/25, and freshness 17/20.
lumar.io does not block any of the major AI crawlers (GPTBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended, ClaudeBot) at the root level.
Add FAQPage JSON-LD to product & info pages. FAQPage schema is the highest-extractability signal for AEO. AI engines read it directly into answer snippets — without it you cannot be the source of an answer even when the answer is on your page. Estimated lift: +8 score points.
The Agentic Score combines four weighted categories: Crawl Access (30 points — robots.txt rules for the four major AI bots plus llms.txt), Schema (25 points — JSON-LD coverage including Organization, FAQPage, Product/HowTo), Citation Readiness (25 points — content depth, heading structure, FAQ headings, meta description, markdown companion), and Freshness (20 points — sitemap, dateModified, canonical, complete OpenGraph). Each signal is measured live from the target domain.
Yes. This report has organic engagement (10 views) and meets the quality threshold for indexing. It appears in our sitemap.xml.