The Agentic Readiness Index

A live, first-party measurement of how ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini see 24 SaaS and tech companies. Each row is a fresh, automated audit — not editorial opinion.

Updated 2026-07-21 · Methodology v1.0 · 26 total audits in dataset · Add your site →

The numbers

61/100

Median score across 24 sites

29%

Missing JSON-LD schema

8%

Block GPTBot in robots.txt

38%

Ship a /llms.txt manifest

8%

WAF-blocked from full audit

Every percentage is computed live from this dataset on every page load. Refresh and you'll get fresh numbers as new audits land. JSON-LD adoption is the single highest-leverage gap across the SaaS landscape — if you fix one thing, fix that.

Top 10 — highest agentic-readiness scores

🥇 #1
78/100
57d ago
searchatlas.com
searchatlas.com
CrawlSchemaCitationFresh
Top fix: Add FAQPage JSON-LD to product & info pages
🥈 #2
77/100
78d ago
Zendesk
zendesk.com
CrawlSchemaCitationFresh
Top fix: Add FAQPage JSON-LD to product & info pages
🥉 #3
77/100
✓ Owner verified77d ago
HubSpot
hubspot.com
CrawlSchemaCitationFresh
Top fix: Add FAQPage JSON-LD to product & info pages
#4
75/100
57d ago
lumar.io
lumar.io
CrawlSchemaCitationFresh
Top fix: Add FAQPage JSON-LD to product & info pages
#5
74/100
78d ago
Salesforce
salesforce.com
CrawlSchemaCitationFresh
Top fix: Add FAQPage JSON-LD to product & info pages
#6
74/100
25d ago
revenueflow.com
revenueflow.com
CrawlSchemaCitationFresh
Top fix: Add dateModified to your pages
#7
71/100
25d ago
rankmath.com
rankmath.com
CrawlSchemaCitationFresh
Top fix: Add FAQPage JSON-LD to product & info pages
#8
70/100
78d ago
kustomer.com
kustomer.com
CrawlSchemaCitationFresh
Top fix: Add FAQPage JSON-LD to product & info pages
#9
68/100
77d ago
thena.ai
thena.ai
CrawlSchemaCitationFresh
Top fix: Add FAQPage JSON-LD to product & info pages
#10
68/100
57d ago
aeoengine.ai
aeoengine.ai
CrawlSchemaCitationFresh
Top fix: Add dateModified to your pages

Score distribution

0–29Not ready
1
1
30–49Significant gaps
5
5
50–69Partially ready
10
10
70–84Good
8
8
85–100Excellent
0

By category

SaaS Platforms · 3

Average score 76/100 across 3 sites. Weakest component: JSON-LD schema coverage (53% of max).

Marketing & SEO · 1

1 site audited.

Other · 20

Average score 57/100 across 20 sites. Weakest component: JSON-LD schema coverage (32% of max).

Sites we cannot fully measure

⚠ 2 sites excluded from rankings

These domains return HTTP 200 but block our automated body fetch at the edge (Cloudflare WAF, TLS fingerprinting, or bot mitigation). The crawl-access score is real, but the schema, citation-readiness, and freshness components could not be measured. We exclude them from the leaderboard rather than show misleading data.

The rest of the index

metlife.com

metlife.com

65

zoho.com

zoho.com

61

Webflow

webflow.com

60

conductor.com

conductor.com

58

blackrock.com

blackrock.com

58

vanta.com

vanta.com

56

thesocialcat.com

thesocialcat.com

53

tryprofound.com

tryprofound.com

52

gitguardian.com

gitguardian.com

49

joinpogo.com

joinpogo.com

47

zillow.com

zillow.com

41

gumloop.com

gumloop.com

37

kaggle.com

kaggle.com

33

yahoo.com

yahoo.com

22

Don't see your site?

Run a free 15-signal agentic audit in 30 seconds. No signup, no credit card.

Audit your site →

How this index works. Each /report/:domain page is an independent, first-party measurement of 15 signals across robots.txt, JSON-LD, sitemap, content structure, and metadata — the same checks AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended) run when deciding whether to cite a site. Sites enter the dataset two ways: organic (a visitor ran the audit at /audit) and seeded (we maintain a hand-curated index of 146 recognized SaaS / tech companies whose AI visibility is industry-relevant for our readers — we run those audits ourselves so this leaderboard is useful from day one rather than waiting for organic coverage). All audits respect a 14-day cooldown between automated re-runs of the same domain.

Why this isn't "scaled content abuse" (per Google's March 2024 update): every /report page contains unique, first-party measurements of a specific domain — not template-filled scaled content. The aggregate stats above (median, percentages, distribution) are derived from those measurements, not generated from templates. The seeded set is small, curated by hand, and limited to recognized brands with genuine search demand for "is X AI-ready"-style queries. Sites without successful body fetches (WAF-blocked) are excluded from rankings rather than masked with default scores; we list them transparently above.

Methodology version: v1.0. Weight changes are versioned and disclosed. Run an audit to see the full per-site breakdown.